02-18-2009, 02:29 PM
I second that , 100%. Add to your points that many of the "made for FSX" labelled add-ons are not quite stable (most likely due to M$ abandonment of developing DirectX 10 fully) , FS9/2004 is the better choice. The internal structure is more transparent, hence errors more easily dixed, and it also - imo - offers more opportunities for tweaking/tuning.
Cheers
Karl
Cheers
Karl
nukefixer Wrote:Greetings,
With the recent turn of events at Microsoft, I have completly removed FSX and re-installed FS2004.
I have a much more powerful computer now, a quad core, and it flew FSX adaquately, but it flys FS2004 a whole lot better....... I have all the sliders maxed out and it doesn't faze it.
I noticed also that I used to fly a lot more when I had FS2004 installed and it had a great bunch of add-ons available, where-as FSX is still developing add-ons, its just didn't seem to have the same bang for me as FS2004 did!
So I also noticed TCA was more or less sticking with the tried and true FS2004, so there is my comment/experience, anyone care to add their two cents?
Gary-TCA3151
Anywhere is.