01-28-2009, 11:39 PM
I have given that option some serious thought - Flightgear is not bad at all (its running on my other PC) , however , the flight dynamics of most a/c types I have seen leave much to be desired - the terrain quality can generally match with FS9, navaids seem to be correct, the painting jobs are imo easier, since the sim does take png and rgb (bmp) graphics. Flightgear is mostly written in C (core) as well as a truckload of xml, which does make it very fast but will make individual scenery design and a/c development somewhat of a challenge.
So. for the time being let's soldier on in FS9 and FS9.5 (aka FSX) :)
Cheers
Karl
So. for the time being let's soldier on in FS9 and FS9.5 (aka FSX) :)
Cheers
Karl
TCA_tech Wrote:I read the bad news yesterday , all of them but did not want to be the one spreading them here. :)
With the market potential FS has, I should not be surprised if some investors' group or other buys ACES up quickly.
Meanwhile, let's hang on and make do with what we have.
Cheers
Karl
Anywhere is.